crack pipe
Crack pipe use is at the heart of a growing public health challenge in the United Kingdom. England has the highest prevalence of crack-cocaine use in Europe, with an estimated 176,752 people using the drug in 2019–20 . The crack pipe—the primary implement for smoking the drug—carries its own set of health risks and legal complexities that are often overlooked.
This article examines the realities of crack pipe use in the UK, including the health harms associated with smoking crack-cocaine, the practice of pipe sharing, and the emerging evidence base for harm reduction interventions. Drawing on recent research and expert analysis, we explore why crack pipe provision remains illegal under UK law despite growing calls for reform.

The Scale of Crack Use in England
Recent research published in BMC Public Health paints a stark picture of crack-cocaine use in England. Among a survey sample of 731 people who had used crack-cocaine in the past 28 days, 99% had smoked the drug . The median age of first use was 22 years, and the median time since first use was 21 years, indicating long-term, entrenched usage patterns .
The study found that 44% of participants reported sharing pipes, and 69% used homemade pipes . Pipe sharing and homemade equipment increase the risk of infectious disease transmission and physical injury such as cuts and burns to the lips and fingers .
The demographic profile of people who smoke crack in England shows high levels of marginalisation: 71% had ever been imprisoned, 35% engaged in criminalised income generation, and 28% reported emergency department attendance in the past six months . The median estimated daily expenditure on crack-cocaine was £40 .
Health Risks of Crack Pipe Use
Respiratory and Physical Harms
Smoking crack cocaine causes significant respiratory complications. The drug vaporises at 187°C, and inhaling this vapour can lead to thermal injury of the pharynx and airways . Acute complications include cough, haemoptysis (coughing blood), pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and haemothorax .
The BMC Public Health study found that 83% of people who smoked crack reported a symptom of a respiratory problem, physical harm or mental health issue in the past 28 days that they related to their crack use . Specifically, 44% reported breathing problems, and 41% reported cut or burned fingers . Two-fifths (41%) had ever been hospitalised for a respiratory-related health problem, with pneumonia being the most common reason (17%), followed by asthma (11%) .
Respiratory symptoms were more common among women (67%) than men (58%), and among women, pipe sharing was associated with increased respiratory symptoms . “Smoking drugs, as opposed to injecting drugs, were described as a crucial method to reduce the risk of overdose, disease acquisition, and societal harms such as police violence” .
Poly-Substance Use
Crack-cocaine use in England rarely occurs in isolation. The survey found that 78% of participants also used heroin, 62% used cannabis, 41% used pregabalin or gabapentin, and 28% used benzodiazepines . This poly-sedative use poses a significant mortality risk from respiratory depression .
Crack Injection: A Growing Concern
Crack is increasingly being injected as well as smoked. Data from the Unlinked Anonymous Monitoring Survey of people who inject drugs in England and Wales found that the proportion reporting crack injection almost doubled between 2011 and 2020/21, from 34% to 57% .
People who inject crack are more likely to share needles and syringes, inject in the groin, overdose, and have hepatitis C infection . This dual pattern—smoking and injecting—complicates harm reduction efforts.
The Legal Status of Crack Pipes in the UK
Under UK law, the provision of smoking equipment for illicit drug use is prohibited. This includes crack pipes . The Safe Inhalation Pipe Provision (SIPP) study protocol notes that “pipes used for crack cocaine smoking are often homemade and/or in short supply, leading to pipe sharing and injuries from use of unsafe materials” .
This legal prohibition sits in tension with the evidence base for harm reduction. A global systematic review found that when people who use drugs were provided with safer smoking materials, they engaged in fewer risky drug use behaviours (e.g., pipe sharing, using broken pipes) and showed improved health outcomes .
Harm Reduction and Safer Smoking Services
The International Evidence
Safer smoking services have been established in several countries. Canada began distributing ‘safer crack use kits’ in 2000, and by 2006 the practice was recommended as ‘best practice’ for harm reduction programs in Ontario . Supervised inhalation spaces have operated in the Netherlands since the 1970s, and Germany and Switzerland introduced similar spaces by 2001 .
A systematic review of safer smoking practices published in the Harm Reduction Journal concluded that “safer smoking practices are essential forms of harm reduction” and that “international policies must be amended to help increase access to these essential tools” .
The SIPP Study: A UK Intervention
The SIPP study, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), is developing and evaluating a crack smoking equipment and training intervention to be distributed through peer networks and specialist drug services in England .
The study’s primary outcome measure is pipe sharing within the past 28 days. Secondary outcomes include use of homemade pipes, service engagement, injecting practice, and acute health harms . The researchers state: “Our goal is to generate an evidence base to inform review of the legislation prohibiting crack pipe supply in the UK. This holds potential to transform harm reduction service provision and engagement nationally” .
Notably, implementation has only been possible with local police approvals, highlighting the legal obstacles to this type of intervention .
Barriers to Access
People who smoke crack in England currently have little reason to engage with harm reduction and drug services, which have traditionally focused on people who inject opioids . Participants across 11 studies reported barriers to accessing safer smoking services, including legal prohibitions and stigma .
Solutions to overcoming these barriers include utilising peer workers and providing safer smoking materials to those who ask . However, the SIPP researchers note that “little is known about this growing population” of people who smoke crack but do not inject or use opioids .
Key Takeaways
- England has the highest prevalence of crack-cocaine use in Europe, with an estimated 176,752 users in 2019–20 .
- 99% of people who use crack smoke it, and 44% share pipes, increasing health risks .
- Respiratory health problems are common, with 60% reporting symptoms such as breathing problems, chest pain, or coughing blood or phlegm .
- Women face greater respiratory harms, with 67% reporting symptoms compared to 58% of men .
- Crack injection is rising, almost doubling from 34% to 57% between 2011 and 2020/21 in England and Wales .
- UK law prohibits crack pipe provision, but international evidence shows that safer smoking materials reduce risky behaviours and improve health outcomes .
- The SIPP study is evaluating a crack pipe and training intervention in England, aiming to generate evidence for legislative reform .
FAQ Section
What is a crack pipe?
A crack pipe is a smoking implement used to vaporise crack-cocaine. It is typically a small glass tube, though users often make homemade versions from materials such as metal or plastic .
How common is crack pipe sharing in England?
Among people who smoke crack-cocaine in England, 44% report sharing pipes .
What are the health risks of smoking crack?
Smoking crack can cause thermal injury to the airways, breathing problems, chest pain, coughing blood, and cut or burned fingers . Crack is also associated with cardiovascular complications, including heart attack and arrhythmias .
Is it legal to supply crack pipes in the UK?
No. Under UK law, the provision of smoking equipment for illicit drug use is prohibited .
What is harm reduction?
Harm reduction is a public health approach that seeks to reduce the adverse health consequences associated with drug use without requiring abstinence . It includes strategies such as providing sterile smoking materials and education.
Does providing crack pipes reduce harm?
International evidence suggests yes. A systematic review found that when people who use drugs were provided with safer smoking materials, they engaged in fewer risky behaviours (e.g., pipe sharing, using broken pipes) and showed improved health outcomes .
Conclusion
Crack pipe use in England is a significant public health concern, embedded in a pattern of poly-substance use, socioeconomic marginalisation, and serious health harms. The high prevalence of pipe sharing, homemade equipment, and respiratory symptoms points to an urgent need for effective interventions.
While international evidence supports the provision of safer smoking materials as a form of harm reduction, UK law currently prohibits this. The SIPP study represents a crucial step towards generating evidence for legislative reform. As the researchers note, “People who smoke crack cocaine in England currently have little reason to engage with harm reduction and drug services” . Addressing this gap is essential to reduce avoidable morbidity and mortality among this vulnerable population.